Shoot to kill.
That was the policy I adopted in my directive. I took particular pains
and was unequivocal in my position that the object of shooting was to
kill. Not to frighten or to chasten. Not to constitute a show of force.
But to kill. I needed a sufficiently high body count to get my message
across - clearly, explicitly and in terms that anyone could
understand.
There were four contingencies when the policy should be applied:
1. Failure to obey written orders.
2. Failure to obey verbal orders.
3. Failure to submit to search and seizure.
4. Harboring, sheltering, maintaining or "countenancing" a relationship
with a blaspheme.
In essence this was a blank check, containing no real limitations. My
forces were free to act as they saw fit, with an implicit understanding
that if any doubt whatsoever existed in their minds, they should kill.
I estimated that it would take four or five days to bring the situation
under control. A total kill of ten to twelve thousand. The first day or
two would be the worst. The situation would still be fluid, the dynamics
capable of breaking in any of several different directions. After that,
after we had demonstrated the seriousness of our intent, I expected
things to go relatively smoothly.
The first day, Adjutant Barnes brought me in a comprehensive report on
the operation. I quickly picked out the figure for kills for the initial
twenty-four hours. I was surprised.
"Eight thousand seven hundred," I said. I looked at AdBar. "That sounds
high."
"That would depend, Mr Secretary." AdBar inclined his head. "In terms of
the actual population it is not a particularly significant figure."
I mulled this over in silence. "How accurate is this? How much error is
inherent in the count?"
"That is a hard number, Mr Secretary. That body count has been confirmed
both through subcom in the field and several independent sources. Those
are known dead. The actual number is undoubtedly higher."
I read the remainder of the report and concluded that, in general,
things were going satisfactorily.
"Issue a general directive to our forces," I said. "Commend them on a
job well done. They are to maintain a heightened state of vigilance at
all times and work toward reestablishing order as quickly as possible.
Their orders remain to execute their mission with severity." I
paused. AdBar did not appear to react to this. "With severity," I
repeated. "Include that in the commendation."
The kill figure for the second day was 13,800. This was unexpected. I
was anticipating something in line with the first day's figure. Eight or
nine thousand. An increase meant that we were not getting our message
across. Either the populace was hardening into opposition against the
operation--a possibility I considered and then discounted--or we had
failed to act with sufficient ruthlessness. This was easily remedied and
I took steps immediately to up the ante.
"AdBar, rescind my directive limiting the use of weaponry to
conventional arms. Anti-personnel weapons and flame throwers are to be
released and employed in instances where circumstances warrant.
Determining these circumstances is the sole discretion of commanders in
the field." These were men whom I had appointed personally and who I
deemed best suited to gauge the actual situation as it existed. In
general they subscribed to the doctrine of responding to resistance with
overwhelming force.
"In instances of disobedience involving groups," I continued, aware of
rumours that not all of the resistance my forces were encountering was
that of individuals acting alone, "I authorize the use of helicopter
gunships." Sometimes simply killing a bunch of people was not
sufficient. Death alone could not quell the most extreme fanaticism. But
the means of death, the nature of injuries and wounds inflicted, could
make a statement and leave a lasting impression. The gunships overhead;
that was our ace in the hole. They would signal that we had taken the
gloves off.
The body count for the third day was 78,400. This was disturbing. The
operation was not proceeding as I had planned or anticipated. It was, in
fact, spiraling out of control.
"What the hell is the matter with these people," I lashed out. "Do they
want to die? I've made it plain to anyone who's paying attention that we
are playing for keeps. How can I make a more emphatic statement than
I've already made."
"Perhaps more people need to die," AdBar suggested equably.
I looked at the Adjutant. For one wild moment it actually crossed my
mind that AdBar was baiting me. Making a sardonic observation about the
rising death toll. Then I dismissed it out of hand. AdBar had carried
out all the orders I had issued promptly and with exactitude. He had
never quibbled or hesitated or interjected his own opinion into the
process. He had been the perfect subordinate: efficient and
self-effacing. I was beginning to wonder if something wasn't wrong with
the man.
"Kill more people, is that the answer?" I said, frustrated and angry.
"I've killed what - a hundred thousand? Where does it end? At what point
do they capitulate and submit to our demands? What will it take to reach
their threshold of pain?"
AdBar appeared confused. He was not prepared to have questions thrown at
him. Sharp, concise, definitive statements was the milieu in which he
was used to operating. Any ambiguity threw him off his stride. He made a
poor sounding board and it occurred to me that it was perhaps a mistake
to surround myself with such people.
"Success is only a matter of time, Mr Secretary. They have to be taught
a lesson." AdBar stated this calmly and without any apparent
reservation. He sounded eerily like me--three days ago.
"Give them another day of it," I said and I tried to sound firm and
self-assured. "Full bore, without let up. Then we'll see."
The fourth day the death toll came in at seventeen thousand. And change.
AdBar showed his first hint of emotion.
"Things appear to be going our way, Mr Secretary. The streets are clear,
the body count is dropping."
We had cowed the population. That was all that that meant. They had,
finally, after a merciless beating, withdrawn inside and conceded the
streets to my forces. It was a tactical victory of sorts. But it was not
the victory that I had been looking for.
"What are the figures on compliance? The voluntary rate at which people
are surrendering their blasphemes?"
Blasphemes, of course, were the genetically engineered pets introduced
by the Chinese. They possessed a virulently addictive trait that had
resulted in plummeting productivity, high rates of absenteeism and a
general disregard and disrespect for the work ethic. They could not be
tolerated.
AdBar adjusted the collar of his uniform. He appeared highly
self-conscious. "Those figures are unavailable, Mr Secretary."
This was military speak for the figures are negligible, inconsequential.
It was a polite way of ducking the issue but it told me all that I
needed to know. The problem had gone underground. It was still there,
still a source of corruption and moral rot. But it was out of the public
eye. I could accept that, declare victory, and gradually pull my forces
back. Or I could adopt an aggressive approach, a proactive solution,
that would entail search and seizure, infiltration, and a network of
paid informants. More death, more pain and no assurance of success. It
was not a difficult choice.
"Set up roadblocks and manned checkpoints across the city. Increase
patrols. Institute a block by block search emphasizing maximum
ruthlessness. We'll flush out the recidivists, eliminate them, and
incarcerate any adherents, proponents, apologists, or sympathizers. We
will not stop, we will not pull back, we will not hesitate or relent
until final victory has been achieved."
AdBar's eyes sparkled with admiration and he rushed off to have my
directive implemented. I sat back at my desk, exhaled, content to have
walked in the paths of righteousness.
***** End *****
One of the tests I apply to any short story I choose is the number of
edits I need to make. I made very few to this one. It is, in my view,
that rarest of gems--a well-written tale with a message. Your
comments?- - g
x x x
|